- This topic has 14 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
After reviewing the active members of this site it has become apparent that the location should no longer matters due to the over saturation of male members to female members.
Approximately 14,000 male members who are seeking female members are on this site compared to 2500 female members seeking male. To put that into simple context, 2500 divided into 14,000 equals 0.178, or 18%. Now that’s 18%. What does that mean. According to google, top universities like MIT, Harvard and Yale except less than 10% of students, while some schools who are not ivy league but still competitive also select a small amount are:
Boston Univeristy,MA- 11%
Davidson UNiversity, NC- 17%
Geogia Institute of Technology- 16%None of these applicants who get accepted to MIT, Harvard or Yale turn down their acceptance because of the location.
For men the chances are so slim on this site most men probably don’t care the location because they are the one applying and this site is quite competitive.
comment if you think location should matter when there are so many men on here.
Just curious, where did you get your numbers?
I think you should be dividing 2500 women into the total number of people, which is 16500. That comes out to 6.6% women, or about 94 men per 6 women, or 15 men per woman. So yeah, lots of competition.
That said, math was never my strong point. 🙂
Don’t assume all the men are in competition. Many didn’t even make it to the starting gate and it’s easier to make a fake male profile than a female since women have to verify with a voice message.
Write in complete sentences, be respectful, make it easy to meet and then you are among a much smaller percentage of the men. I know of many men on this site who have met multiple women.
I wish we could filter out profiles with less than 500 words. If you ran the numbers on men whose profiles say more than “me like boobies” you’d find there are not that many men with profiles of any depth on here.
You are assuming every woman is here to find a partner and that someone is a male.
So you are being optimistic I guess!!
Wouldn’t it be a good a idea if we managed to get more women to join? And once they joined, we’d make sure they would want to stay?
I meant not all women on here are looking for a partner and those who are are’t always looking for a male.
I’m not sure what you stats prove other than the men on this site outnumber the women.
Location certainly matters. While I may chat with someone clear across the country, it is nice to know that others share your desire even when meeting is improbable.
I’d rather have a partner an hour away that I can meet more frequently than one that is five hours away. Distance certainly matters when trying to have a relationship that is more than a chat buddy.
I’m going to have to up my game. “Me like boobies” doesn’t seem to be cutting it. 😜I’m not sure I buy the college admissions analogy, David.🤔 Women aren’t universities and men aren’t applicants competing for a limited number of acceptance letters.
If there are 14,000 men here, I’m not choosing between 14,000 men. Not even close. 😂 Most of us are eliminating each other from consideration LONG before location ever becomes an issue!
Age, attraction, personality, relationship status, what you’re looking for, how you communicate, whether you’re interesting, whether you make me laugh, whether I can tolerate five consecutive messages from you. All of that whittles 14,000 down pretty damn quickly!
And honestly, I think location starts to matter MORE once you actually find someone you genuinely like.
Harvard can accept someone from California and reasonably assume she’ll move to Massachusetts. A woman in Washington can meet the most fascinating man in Florida and still have to figure out what the hell Tuesday night looks like.
With the numbers this lopsided, a man probably doesn’t need to somehow beat 14,000 other men…He just needs to stop eliminating himself.
Judging by some of the opening messages women receive around here, that may be considerably easier than getting into Harvard. 🤓
Many profiles are just a triangle with not even any effort being put to add a picture of some kind. Imagine talking to a triangle in chat and it’s trying to make a point.. I was not very good at calculus and I already am a bit off at the lack of effort on the triangles side to do anything other than say .. “are you lactating “? “What size are your boobies and tits”? “How’s your experience been on here “? The “Me want Jane ..” worked for Tarzan.
For some users, there is also the immediate emphasis on sex which is a big turn off tbh. You send me a dick pick or want to fantasize while I am online and think I love it ? Are you on a porn site? There are a few good men for all the plenty on the site.. I could count them on my fingertips.. so the ratio isn’t correct.
Finding an ABF relationship here can feel like looking for a needle in a haystack. Because of that, I highly value clear communication, respect, and kindness. It goes a long way in my humble opinion.
With respect, your numbers are not correct.
If you want to compare men vs women seeking men, then you need to add together the totals for “women seeking men” with the total for “women seeking both men and women”, as the search function treats these as separate totals, separate groups of users.
You get …
Women seeking men = 2406
Women seeking both men and women = 1633
Total = 4039Men seeking = 14736
Calculate your percentage now, and it comes to 21.5 percent.
Thank you for the update everyone. And thank you Michael so we have 21.5% before a picture or message is even sent. Which basically means the chances are low before you even click send
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.