- This topic has 74 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Exactly, these days if you say something enough times, some people just believe it as truth.
Intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to put tomatoes in a fruit salad.
What about olives, peppers and cucumber? Only leaves 🍃🍂 lettuce really doesn’t it?
Wellness Check: Has everyone taken their meds today?? Mine are specifically designed to make me faster than a Volkswagon. 😁
Haha yeah I’ve taken my meds thanks 😁 I hope you’re not driving in Wales if you’re going faster than 20mph 🥴
@clowey if the invasion occurs I’m bring BBQ sauce. Nothing like barbecued Roo!🤗😜😂🤣
Sounds perfect Grogman, I’ll join your team! You have enough BBQ sauce?!
Water Lily: Drs. Bailey, both Mrs and Mr, have nobel prise winners on their team. One offered 1/4 million $ for anyone who could prove that virus exist. A man came forward and it went to court. When the **scientific** evidences was examined in the appellate court, it was ruled that there was no scientific, controlled study that has **ever** proven that virus exist let alone that they can be harmful.
She has been “debunked” by the swamp, not by science. Maybe you don’t have a scientific background that would given you the understanding of “science” provability. i.e. what actually is required to obtain a “gold standard.” There is no gold standard ever purified for COVID. None exists. The PCR test requires a gold standard. Even beyond that, the inventor (nobel winner) of the PCR test stated that it was not a viable diagnostic tool. It was created only for laboratory analysis. It replicates DNA. It doesn’t verify a particular item. And the replication that is used in the “proof” that and individual has COVID actually disqualifies itself as “proof” because the more you replicate something the less it purifies. Again, virus have **never** been purified and there are plenty of scientific papers out there which prove that. This is why virology is under attack as being legit.
“Study to who yourselves approved.”
I think so. It’s the number of smokers and amount of charcoal that I don’t have a good handle on.😜
Well if you ever took your hands off of little Grog, you could get a better handle on it
Lol 🤣 I tookt.meds and then some!
99% of scientific papers say the opposite of what you claim so you cherry pick the 1% that say what you want them to say. That’s hardly scientific.
Awwww, Grog’s poor one brain cell 🤣🤣🤣
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.