- This topic has 25 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 8 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
@sccs21801
I understand. it’s a shame that the responses you’re getting and childish. In that case you’ve every case block liberally. Sorry for your frustration.ATTENTION: you must NOT use this forum to personally identify any other user by name or username, for criticism etc.
Criticism can always be expressed generally, without identifying the person.
And – obviously – someone’s phone number can not be revealed. Irrespective of how annoyed you are at them.
Interestingly enough, he identified himself, without any solicitation from me. Did he actually discuss any “site vulnerabilities” with you? I’d be interested to know. As I think would many of the women in this community.
If you felt the need to censor my responses, I would have appreciated the offending information – i.e. his user name, avatar, and phone number that he shared (unsolicited and only to me) be the items censored out.
My reposting of his unsolicited communications to me were fair and prime examples of how “seemingly benign” communications are actually just the opposite. My responses to them were appropriate calls of attention to “wolf in sheep’s clothing” behavior, and this community would have benefited from reading such.
I respectfully request that you return my responses to this post, sans the “helpful gentleman’s” private information that HE so inappropriately shared.
I will also take ownership of my mistake. I should have taken the time to edit out his username, name, and phone number. If you return my replies to this post, they are certainly appropriate censorship.
It has come to our attention that there exists a risk of confusion between Payton Manning, a natural person, and Peyton Manning, a well-known public figure, including his fans and stalkers;
WHEREAS, Payton Manning has requested that we continue to use her name and not censor her in any way, and to take measures to prevent any confusion between her and Peyton Manning or any of his fans and stalkers;
WHEREAS, it is our policy to respect the wishes of individuals regarding the use of their names and to take reasonable steps to prevent confusion or harm;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
We shall continue to use the name Payton Manning in accordance with her wishes and without censorship.
We shall take reasonable measures to prevent any confusion between Payton Manning and Peyton Manning, including but not limited to, clearly indicating that Payton Manning is not affiliated with Peyton Manning, and that any references to Peyton Manning or his fans and stalkers are not intended to refer to Payton Manning or any of her fans or stalkers.
We shall not be liable for any confusion or harm arising from the use of the names Payton Manning or Peyton Manning, or any related references, except to the extent required by law.
We shall cooperate with Payton Manning and any law enforcement agencies in the event of any threats or harassment directed towards her or her associates, and shall take appropriate measures to protect her safety and security.
This resolution shall be binding on all parties involved and shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is executed.😂
I simply adore you!😘
Bravo, Bravo, Bravo!!! Now what is your address? 🙂
@chuck, I assume and I’m hoping that last little bit was intended to be a joke. I do think that it’s in very poor taste though and that this post is not the place for a joke like that.
Agreed it’s in very poor taste if any at all given the intent of her post which we discussed before she made it.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.